COVID Vaccines Harm Newborns, Study Proves
Moderna Causes More Fetal Damage than Pfizer due to Higher Dose
Last October, I posted two articles based on data accidentally provided by the CDC, showing proof of the dangers of Covid vaccines in pregnancy. A large CDC dataset showed that miscarriages and infant deaths are significantly more prevalent in pregnancies where mothers took a (higher dose) Moderna vaccine than mothers who took a (lower dose) Pfizer vaccine.
Today, we will look at another recent study touting “antibody transfer to infants,” which incidentally shows the same dose-response relationship and greater fetal damage for Moderna, a higher-dose vaccine than Pfizer.
The study followed 76 pregnant women and recorded health outcomes for their newborns.
Despite falsely claiming “no adverse outcomes,” the study shows plenty of adverse outcomes for infants – following the dose-response pattern I discussed previously!
Take a look at Supplement 1:
You can see how much worse the higher-dose Moderna vaccine is compared to the lower-dose (but also harmful) Pfizer vaccine.
For example, 8.8% of infants born to Moderna-vaccinated mothers had congenital anomalies, almost four times worse than Pfizer-vaccinated mothers and several times the historical rate.
EDIT: Our reader Nathan pointed out that I did not mention pre-eclampsia, which normally affects only 4.6% of mothers (link here), but in our case, was 25%.
17.7% of Moderna infants had to go to NICU (neonatal intensive care unit)! This is twice the normal rate.
Moderna vaccinated women had four preterm births. While the sample size is small, the preterm births are higher in the Moderna group, confirming the same dose-response relationship where the amount of harm is greater with the higher dose.
The preterm rate is also significantly understated because the study excluded three women who “delivered before completing initial vaccine series,” so those deliveries were preterm:
Of 81 participants enrolled, 5 were excluded after enrollment: 1 terminated pregnancy, 1 received the third vaccine dose prior to delivery, and 3 delivered prior to completing the initial vaccine series.
The study is silent on why exactly one pregnancy was terminated, with the mother excluded from the study data set. Most vaccinations (66 out of 76) were in the second and third trimesters, usually well after abortions are done for family planning purposes. Was the termination due to another congenital anomaly?
The above-mentioned “anomalies” in children born to vaccinated mothers are serious and disturbing:
I hope the affected infants get appropriate care and become happy and healthy adults.
One of the authors of the above study is familiar to us: the Bill Gates-sponsored Dr. Stephanie Gaw conducted a study designed from the outset NOT to find mRNA vaccines in breast milk.
Just as in her previous study, Dr. Stephanie Gaw’s latest analysis of the 76 pregnancies we are discussing today, glosses over fetal damage rates and makes unfounded claims about how “Covid vaccines are safe for pregnancy,” despite the data showing that they are not safe.
Such is the sad state of Covid science. Adverse effects are ignored; the findings are presented as evidence of safety despite the red flags.
What do you think? Will they ever stop fudging data?
Originally published on the author’s Substack
One of our country’s most important freedoms is that of free speech.
Agree with this essay? Disagree? Join the debate by writing to DailyClout HERE.